☰ Menu

Postgraduate Training Course in Reproductive Health/Chronic Disease

Visual inspection with acetic acid as a cervical cancer screening tool for developing countries - M.J.V. Germar

Table 1 : Description of Studies Reviewed

Authors/ Year
(Reference)
Type of study Purpose No of women screened Setting Technique Intervention (VIA) done by Independence of assessments Key Statistics Reference Standard Comments
Megevand et al 1996 (20) Cross sectional VIA as an alternative to cytology 2426 Community-based (Mobile clinics in a squatter area in Cape Town, South Africa)  described Trained Nurses, Community Health workers Cytotechnologist not blinded to result Positive Predictive Value Colposcopy with or without a biopsy Cytotechnologist not blinded to study results, limited by lack of information on those patients negative on VIA and cytology
Sankaranarayanan et al 1998 (21) Cross sectional Compare performance of VIA and cytology 3000 Community-based (Open access cancer detection clinics in Karala, India)  described Trained cytotechnologists blinded Sensitivity ratio, approximate sensitivity, approximate specificity Colposcopy with or without a biopsy Reference test not applied to women who were screening test negative
Sankanarayanan et al 1999 (22)  Cross sectional Compare performance of VIA and cytology 1351 Community-based  (In Ernakulam, India)  described Trained nurses blinded Sensitivity ratio, approximate sensitivity, approximate specificity Colposcopy with or without a biopsy Reference test not applied to women who were screening test negative
University of Zimbabwe/ JHPIEGO 1999 (26) Cross sectional Test qualities of VIA 10934
phase 1-8731
phase 2-2203
Community-based  (151 clinics Chitungwiza and Greater Harare Area, Zimbabwe)  described Trained nurse-midwife blinded Sensitivity/Specificity Colposcopy with or without a biopsy Phase 1- work up vias,
Phase 2- all women underwent gold standard
Denny et al 2000 (23) Cross sectional Compare performance of cytology, VIA, VIA with magnification and HPV DNA in detecting HGSIL  2944 Community based (clinics in Khagelitska, South Africa) described Trained nurses blinded Sensitivity ratio, approximate sensitivity, approximate specificity Colposcopy with or without a biopsy Reference standard not applied to the women who were screening test negative
Cronje et al 2000 (27) Cross sectional Compare cytology, cervicography, VIA 6301 Community based (Volunteers throughout Free State Province of South Africa)  described Trained Nurses blinded Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value Colposcopy with biopsy Gold standard done on all women
Belinson , Quia et al 2001 (28) Cross-sectional Determine accuracy of 6 screening tests: conventional cytology, liquid based cytology, VIA, colposcopy, HPV testing, fluorescence spectroscopy  1997 Community-based (Rural Shanxi Province, China) described Gynaecologic Oncologists blinded Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value Colposcopy with biopsy Gold standard done on all women
Result may not be reproducible VIA performed by Gynaecologic Oncologists
Ngelangel et al 2001 (29) Cross sectional VIA alone, VIA with magnification compared to cytology  13,710 Hospital based (6 Metro Manila Hospitals and 6 regional Hospitals Philippines) described Tained nurses, midwives, physicians from community centres blinded Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, Negative Predictive Value Colposcopy with or without a biopsy Reference standard used was colposcopy not applied to the women who were screening test negative
Denny et al 2002 (24) Cross Sectional Compare VIA and VIA with magnification to cytology 2754 Community based (Periurban settlement in Cape Town, South Africa) described Trained Nurses blinded Sensitivity ratio, approximate sensitivity, approximate specificity Colposcopy with or without a biopsy Reference standard not applied to the women who were screening test negative